Minecraft Forums

Quote from Azelka

Looks great!

Also, what shaders are i that screenshot?

Quote from damo333333

There is a person steling your doh man
http://www.minecraft.../#entry23944826

Quote from kyctarniq

Be certain to give credit to the textures you used as your base. I recognise Fragoon's Better Lava for one!

Quote from Dack105

[...] Though from what i can see, it's pretty good! Much better than most simple texture-packs

p.s. you should probably find a more original name; in this community, using 'simple' in your texture-pack name leads to automatically thinking it's a crappy bucket fill pack, and then people avoid it.

Quote from Rillian

Why not "MetalTxus' Textures" or something like that? It's not like your name has a whole bunch of numbers in it or anything, so it's certainly fine to use as a name for a pack.

Quote from Minecrafter1912

Will you make a 64x version?? If not, I shall have to stick with the 32x version :/ (32x Texturepacks are too pixely for me in general)

Quote from corner_g

You can change the title yourself. You will need to in order to keep the compatible version number consistent, which is required.
At the bottom of your post, beside the "Multiquote" button, there is an edit button. Then, below the editor box, there is a "use full editor" button. From there, you can edit topic polls, titles, etc.

Regarding the pack, some textures look very nice, such as the netherrack. I am very much liking that. However, I think the sand could use some sort of texture. I realize that your texture pack is generally simple, but it doesn't look good if a texture is one solid colour with no texture whatsoever. Sand looks nice with a subtle texture, but it should have some texture, otherwise the shading on an otherwise flat texture looks very sharp and out of place. I would suggest adding some subtle texture to any textures that don't already have one, because it is fine to have it simplistic, but it definitely should still have a texture.